What WIN actually builds.
Two shipping products, and a third in development. This is the standard of work you get inside a Build engagement.
Two shipping products, and a third in development. This is the standard of work you get inside a Build engagement.
Know your rights. Use them.
A free, plain-language tool for anyone renting in Ireland. You type your question in your own words; the tool surfaces an answer grounded in real Residential Tenancies Board decisions, with the case references attached so you can show your landlord exactly what the Tribunal has said before.
Translated into 14 languages because tenant rights aren't useful if they're locked behind a language barrier. Free because charging for them defeats the point.
The RTB Tribunal publishes every decision it makes. There are 25,000+ of them. They're searchable in theory and unreadable in practice — legalistic, sprawling, scattered across a portal that wasn't designed for renters under stress. Most people don't know their landlord just broke the law because they can't find the decision that says so.
Free. Plain language. Backed by real cases.
In a Rent Pressure Zone, no. Rent reviews are capped — currently at 2% per year or inflation, whichever is lower. Outside an RPZ, increases must still be reasonable and properly notified.
Sample interaction. SAMPLE.
Section 19(4) breach where RPZ cap exceeded; €4,200 redress ordered. Landlord argued substantial change exemption; rejected on evidence.
10.4% increase outside RPZ cap; landlord ordered to refund overcharge. Notice period also defective under §22.
Sample search result. SAMPLE.
Precedent intelligence for Irish housing law.
The same 25,000-decision RTB corpus that powers righttostay — re-shaped for the people who bill by the hour. Stare is for solicitors doing housing work, in-house counsel at letting agencies and councils, and compliance teams who need to know how the Tribunal has actually been deciding cases, not how the Act reads on paper.
Vector search plus keyword filters. Citations every time. And it speaks MCP — so it plugs straight into the AI assistants your firm is already paying for, without exporting anything to a third-party LLM.
Irish housing law has roughly two minutes of statute and twenty years of Tribunal decisions deciding what that statute means in practice. Junior solicitors spend hours reading PDFs from the RTB portal to find three citations. Partners pay them for it. Compliance teams skip the exercise entirely and hope.
Subject access requests, answered properly.
Under GDPR, anyone can ask your organisation for a copy of their personal data — and once they ask, a one-month clock starts. Answering means finding every relevant document, redacting other people's information page by page, writing a proper response letter, and keeping a record that shows you did it right.
ReplyPack is the tool we're building to carry that load. You upload the documents. AI proposes the redactions. Your team reviews and decides every single one — nothing is redacted, or released, without a human saying so. The deadline clock, the response letter, and the audit trail come as part of the job, not as extra jobs.
Most organisations handle a subject access request by hand: someone hunts through mailboxes and shared drives, prints everything to PDF, and squints at every page for names that aren't the requester's. It's slow, it's stressful, and it fails in both directions — miss a redaction and you've disclosed someone else's personal data; miss the deadline and the complaint goes to the regulator. For a small team, one request can eat a week.
The teams where a request lands on top of someone's actual day job. Charities, SMEs, schools, sports clubs, letting agencies, and public and semi-state bodies — plus the DPOs and data protection leads who look after several organisations at once. If your current process is a mailbox search and a highlighter, ReplyPack is being built for you.
I spoke with [redacted] on Tuesday and she confirmed the meeting with [redacted] took place on 14 March.
Concept preview. In development. SAMPLE.
Two products shipping. A third in development.
We build because we use it ourselves — the consulting work and the products feed each other.
Tell us where you're stuck. No pitch, no sales sequence — usually a reply within 24 hours, from a named human.
USUALLY REPLY WITHIN 24 HOURS · NO SALES SEQUENCE
We'd like to use Google Analytics to understand how people find What If Now. Nothing runs until you agree. See our privacy policy.